Donald Trump’s first day as the 47th President of the United States was highlighted by a major initiative aimed at transforming the nation’s immigration policies.
However, critics argue that this decision will only further marginalize vulnerable communities and create uncertainty for immigrant families. The implications of this policy are extensive, potentially disrupting schools, workplaces, and entire neighborhoods.
The policy change is scheduled to take effect 30 days after the order is issued, a move likely to spark legal challenges.
One of the most significant impacts of this policy will be on Indian families who have relied on birth tourism to secure US citizenship for their children. Birth tourism, which involves traveling to the US to give birth, has been a common practice among Mexican and Indian families. However, Trump’s new policy is expected to effectively end this practice.
According to the US Census Bureau, around 5 million Indian Americans currently live in the US, accounting for about 1.47 percent of the population. Of these, only 34 percent are born in the US, while the remaining two-thirds are immigrants.
Most Indian nationals working in the US hold H1-B visas, meaning that hundreds of Indian-origin children born on US soil will not receive automatic citizenship under President Trump’s executive order.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has raised concerns about the constitutionality of Trump’s executive order, pointing to the clear language of the 14th Amendment regarding birthright citizenship. The ACLU has also emphasized the potential for mass deportations, family separations, and other human rights violations stemming from Trump’s immigration policies.
In a press release, the ACLU stated, “Immigrants’ rights advocates today sued the Trump administration over its executive order that seeks to strip certain babies born in the United States of their U.S. citizenship.”
As the conflict over birthright citizenship and immigration reform escalates, the destinies of millions of families remain in jeopardy. Legal challenges are expected to be instrumental in influencing the course of this contentious policy. Ultimately, the resolution will depend on the dedication of advocates, lawmakers, and the judiciary to protect the rights of marginalized communities and uphold the values of justice and equality embedded in the US Constitution.